The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resilience: the governance of complexity
Abstract
1. Introduction: The Rise of Resilience, Part One: Thematics 2. Governing Complexity 3. Resilience: Putting Life to Work Part Two: Resilience and the International 4. The Politics of Limits: The Rise of Complexity in Peacebuilding, 5. The 'Everyday' Policy Solution: Culture, from Limit to Resource 6. A New Global Ethic: The Transformative Power of the Embedded Subject Part Three: The Politics of Resilience 7. Revealing the Public: The Reality of the Event and the Banality of Evil 8. The Democracy of Participation 9. The Poverty of Post-Humanism 10. Conclusion: Resilience, the Promise of Complexity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“national and psychological responses to the Second World War incorporated understandings of resilience as the inner attributes of the subject, such as character, fortitude, and grit.”
From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Chandler 2014: 10
In the citing paper
“The resilient subject was conceived of as capable of overcoming environmental challenges or oppressive social conditions through her inner strengths and capacities.”
From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Chandler 2014: 10
In the citing paper
“Britain was resilient because the superior firepower of the German air force failed to achieve its aim of defeating and demoralising the British people during the Blitz”
From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Chandler 2014: 10
In the citing paper
“In response to post-imperial decline, British self-representation held that Britain was able to ' bat above its weight ' because of the ' bulldog ' spirit of its people”
From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Chandler 2014: 10
In the citing paper
“In Britain, resilience has become ' the policy buzzword of choice ' (Chandler 2014: 1), presented as a solution to governance questions as wide ranging as international development aid, the war on terror, and the prevalence of depression.”
From Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment” (2021) · cites this paper as Chandler 2014: 1
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Mindfulness and Resilience in Britain: A Genealogy of the “Present Moment”
Cook, J. (2021) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4727573 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2015-01-21
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 52-3329-52-3329
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W100145607
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- resilience, complexity, international politics, peacebuilding, global ethics, embedded subjects, banality of evil, public sphere, posthumanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
