Cited by 64Study and Philosophy of ReligionEvolution and Science EducationEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion

Open access
Helen De Cruz, Johan De Smedt·2015·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

[from the publisher's website] Questions about the existence and attributes of God form the subject matter of natural theology, which seeks to gain knowledge of the divine by relying on reason and experience of the world. Arguments in natural theology rely largely on intuitions and inferences that seem natural to us, occurring spontaneously—at the sight of a beautiful landscape, perhaps, or in wonderment at the complexity of the cosmos—even to a nonphilosopher. In this book, Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt examine the cognitive origins of arguments in natural theology. They find that although natural theological arguments can be very sophisticated, they are rooted in everyday intuitions about purpose, causation, agency, and morality. Using evidence and theories from disciplines including the cognitive science of religion, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary aesthetics, and the cognitive science of testimony, they show that these intuitions emerge early in development and are a stable part of human cognition. -/- De Cruz and De Smedt analyze the cognitive underpinnings of five well-known arguments for the existence of God: the argument from design, the cosmological argument, the moral argument, the argument from beauty, and the argument from miracles. Finally, they consider whether the cognitive origins of these natural theological arguments should affect their rationality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.190024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D.
Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
52
Issue
11
Pages
52-5819-52-5819
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W411209709
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
natural theology, cognitive science of religion, philosophy of religion, proof of God's existence, design argument, cosmological argument, moral argument, agency, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary aesthetics, human cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.190024
The paper
Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2015). A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.190024