The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion
Open accessAbstract
[from the publisher's website] Questions about the existence and attributes of God form the subject matter of natural theology, which seeks to gain knowledge of the divine by relying on reason and experience of the world. Arguments in natural theology rely largely on intuitions and inferences that seem natural to us, occurring spontaneously—at the sight of a beautiful landscape, perhaps, or in wonderment at the complexity of the cosmos—even to a nonphilosopher. In this book, Helen De Cruz and Johan De Smedt examine the cognitive origins of arguments in natural theology. They find that although natural theological arguments can be very sophisticated, they are rooted in everyday intuitions about purpose, causation, agency, and morality. Using evidence and theories from disciplines including the cognitive science of religion, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary aesthetics, and the cognitive science of testimony, they show that these intuitions emerge early in development and are a stable part of human cognition. -/- De Cruz and De Smedt analyze the cognitive underpinnings of five well-known arguments for the existence of God: the argument from design, the cosmological argument, the moral argument, the argument from beauty, and the argument from miracles. Finally, they consider whether the cognitive origins of these natural theological arguments should affect their rationality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“teleology does not automatically entail divine design.”
From The Challenge of Evolution to Religion (2019) · cites this paper as De Cruz & De Smedt, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Positive Illusions in Parenting: Every Child is Above Average”
Wenger, A., & Fowers, B. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00319.x · Cited by 54
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Challenge of Evolution to Religion
De Smedt, J., & De Cruz, H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/9781108685436 · Cited by 33
Self-citationHow Psychological Dispositions Influence the Theology of the Afterlife
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2017) · The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-48609-7_22 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D.
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2015-06-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 52-5819-52-5819
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W411209709
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- philarchive.org
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- natural theology, cognitive science of religion, philosophy of religion, proof of God's existence, design argument, cosmological argument, moral argument, agency, evolutionary ethics, evolutionary aesthetics, human cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.190024
- The paper
- Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2015). A natural history of natural theology: the cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.190024