The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition
Abstract
Based on twenty years of clinical experience studying and treating chronic illness, a Harvard psychiatrist and anthropologist argues that diagnosing illness is an art tragically neglected by modern medical training, and presents a compelling case for bridging the gap between patient and doctor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coping theory and research: past, present, and future
Lazarus, R. S. (1993) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002 · Cited by 3,253
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9 · Cited by 2,169
The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry
Borrell-Carrio, F. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.245 · Cited by 1,546
Anthropology in the Clinic: The Problem of Cultural Competency and How to Fix It
Kleinman, A., & Benson, P. (2006) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030294 · Cited by 1,190
The Social Construction of Illness: Key Insights and Policy Implications
Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146510383495 · Cited by 888
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1988-09-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 26-0340-26-0340
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1892874968
- Cited by
- 3,578
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-0340
- The paper
- The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition. (1988). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-0340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
