Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 738

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data

·1989·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1 Introduction to the Power-Divergence Statistic.- 1.1 A Unified Approach to Model Testing.- 1.2 The Power-Divergence Statistic.- 1.3 Outline of the Chapters.- 2 Defining and Testing Models: Concepts and Examples.- 2.1 Modeling Discrete Multivariate Data.- 2.2 Testing the Fit of a Model.- 2.3 An Example: Time Passage and Memory Recall.- 2.4 Applying the Power-Divergence Statistic.- 2.5 Power-Divergence Measures in Visual Perception.- 3 Modeling Cross-Classified Categorical Data.- 3.1 Association Models and Contingency Tables.- 3.2 Two-Dimensional Tables: Independence and Homogeneity.- 3.3 Loglinear Models for Two and Three Dimensions.- 3.4 Parameter Estimation Methods: Minimum Distance Estimation.- 3.5 Model Generation: A Characterization of the Loglinear, Linear, and Other Models through Minimum Distance Estimation.- 3.6 Model Selection and Testing Strategy for Loglinear Models.- 4 Testing the Models: Large-Sample Results.- 4.1 Significance Levels under the Classical (Fixed-Cells) Assumptions.- 4.2 Efficiency under the Classical (Fixed-Cells) Assumptions.- 4.3 Significance Levels and Efficiency under Sparseness Assumptions.- 4.4 A Summary Comparison of the Power-Divergence Family Members.- 4.5 Which Test Statistic?.- 5 Improving the Accuracy of Tests with Small Sample Size.- 5.1 Improved Accuracy through More Accurate Moments.- 5.2 A Second-Order Correction Term Applied Directly to the Asymptotic Distribution.- 5.3 Four Approximations to the Exact Significance Level: How Do They Compare?.- 5.4 Exact Power Comparisons.- 5.5 Which Test Statistic?.- 6 Comparing the Sensitivity of the Test Statistics.- 6.1 Relative Deviations between Observed and Expected Cell Frequencies.- 6.2 Minimum Magnitude of the Power-Divergence Test Statistic.- 6.3 Further Insights into the Accuracy of Large-Sample Approximations.- 6.4 Three Illustrations.- 6.5 Transforming for Closer Asymptotic Approximations in Contingency Tables with Some Small Expected Cell Frequencies.- 6.6 A Geometric Interpretation of the Power-Divergence Statistic.- 6.7 Which Test Statistic?.- 7 Links with Other Test Statistics and Measures of Divergence.- 7.1 Test Statistics Based on Quantiles and Spacings.- 7.2 A Continuous Analogue to the Discrete Test Statistic.- 7.3 Comparisons of Discrete and Continuous Test Statistics.- 7.4 Diversity and Divergence Measures from Information Theory.- 8 Future Directions.- 8.1 Hypothesis Testing and Parameter Estimation under Sparseness Assumptions.- 8.2 The Parameter ? as a Transformation.- 8.3 A Generalization of Akaike's Information Criterion.- 8.4 The Power-Divergence Statistic as a Measure of Loss and a Criterion for General Parameter Estimation.- 8.5 Generalizing the Multinomial Distribution.- Historical Perspective: Pearson's X2 and the Loglikelihood Ratio Statistic G2.- 1. Small-Sample Comparisons of X2 and G2 under the Classical (Fixed-Cells) Assumptions.- 2. Comparing X2 and G2 under Sparseness Assumptions.- 3. Efficiency Comparisons.- 4. Modified Assumptions and Their Impact.- Appendix: Proofs of Important Results.- A1. Some Results on Rao Second-Order Efficiency and Hodges-Lehmann Deficiency (Section 3.4).- A2. Characterization of the Generalized Minimum Power-Divergence Estimate (Section 3.5).- A3. Characterization of the Lancaster-Additive Model (Section 3.5).- A4. Proof of Results (i), (ii), and (iii) (Section 4.1).- A5. Statement of Birch's Regularity Conditions and Proof that the Minimum Power-Divergence Estimator Is BAN (Section 4.1).- A6. Proof of Results (i*), (ii*), and (iii*) (Section 4.1).- A7. The Power-Divergence Generalization of the Chernoff-Lehmann Statistic: An Outline (Section 4.1).- A8. Derivation of the Asymptotic Noncentral Chi-Squared Distribution for the Power-Divergence Statistic under Local Alternative Models (Section 4.2).- A9. Derivation of the Mean and Variance of the Power-Divergence Statistic for ? > -1 under a Nonlocal Alternative Model (Section 4.2).- A10. Proof of the Asymptotic Normality of the Power-Divergence Statistic under Sparseness Assumptions (Section 4.3).- A12. Derivation of the Second-Order Terms for the Distribution Function of the Power-Divergence Statistic under the Classical (Fixed-Cells) Assumptions (Section 5.2).- A13. Derivation of the Minimum Asymptotic Value of the Power-Divergence Statistic (Section 6.2).- A14. Limiting Form of the Power-Divergence Statistic as the Parameter ? ? +- ? (Section 6.2).- Author Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.26-2740

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 738

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1989-01-01
Volume
26
Issue
05
Pages
26-2740-26-2740
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2081985429
Cited by
738
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-2740
The paper
Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-2740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.