Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 858

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology

·1989·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Presents a coherent examination of wood decay processes, with close examination of the biology of the fungi involved. Brings together diverse material on the complex interactions between wood resources, organisms, and the environment--all of which influence the decay process. Provides detailed coverage on the microenvironment of wood, the nature of the organisms inhabiting it, and the various ways in which wood influences natural and human-made ecosystems. In addition to in-depth technical information, the authors present personal and speculative views designed to provoke debate and stimulate new approaches to the prevention, treatment, and manipulation of the wood decay process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.26-3888

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 858

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1989-03-01
Volume
26
Issue
07
Pages
26-3888-26-3888
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1504440342
Cited by
858
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.26-3888
The paper
Fungal decomposition of wood: its biology and ecology. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.26-3888

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.