The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Direct democracy: the politics of initiative, referendum, and recall
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work
Giné, V. L., & Tsebelis, G. (2003) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40184562 · Cited by 3,359
Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation
Hanemann, W. M. (1994) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.19 · Cited by 1,640
Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5275 · Cited by 915
Altman, D. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511933950 · Cited by 537
Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives
Gerber, E. R. (1996) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111696 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1989-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 27-0567-27-0567
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1607460689
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct democracy: the politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.27-0567
- The paper
- Direct democracy: the politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. (1989). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-0567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
