Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 395

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law

·1990·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Part 1 Humanitarian instruments as customary law: the importance of a norm's customary character reservations to humanitarian and human rights instruments and customary law - the Nicaragua judgement, the antecedents to Nicaragua, Geneva conventions - assessing practice, opinio juris and violations additional protocols of 1977. Part 2 Human rights instruments and customary law: the quest for universality the international court of justice and customary human rights customary human rights in selected national courts. Part 3 Responsibility of states for violations of human rights and humanitarian rights: mapping recourse options imputability, acts of state, private acts exhaustion of local remedies obligations of means and obligations of result obligations erga omnes judicial remedies - is damage a condition for state responsibility? violations as international crimes and as international delicts state of necessity and derogations responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law - special problems the relationship between remedies in human rights treaties and other remedies countermeasures and non-judicial remedies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.27-4116

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1990-03-01
Volume
27
Issue
07
Pages
27-4116-27-4116
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2142072297
Cited by
395
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.27-4116
The paper
Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. (1990). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.27-4116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.