The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Talking science: language, learning, and values
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Where's the evidence that active learning works?
Michael, J. (2006) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006 · Cited by 1,648
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20035 · Cited by 1,596
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHING AND LEARNING
Palincsar, A. S. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345 · Cited by 1,565
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20012 · Cited by 1,408
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 28-5211-28-5211
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W35599901
- Cited by
- 3,996
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Talking science: language, learning, and values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.28-5211
- The paper
- Talking science: language, learning, and values. (1991). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.28-5211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
