The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Yellowstone vegetation: consequences of environment and history in a natural setting
Abstract
Plant-environment interactions as seen in the park.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park
Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0953 · Cited by 1,351
Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: The first 15years after wolf reintroduction
Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.005 · Cited by 884
EFFECTS OF FIRE SIZE AND PATTERN ON EARLY SUCCESSION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., Gardner, R. H., & Hargrove, W. W. (1997) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0411:eofsap]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 559
Trophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range
Ripple, W. J., Larsen, E. J., Renkin, R. A., & Smith, D. W. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00107-0 · Cited by 452
Whitlock, C., & Millspaugh, S. H. (1996) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/095968369600600102 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 29-2095-29-2095
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1483577629
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yellowstone vegetation: consequences of environment and history in a natural setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.29-2095
- The paper
- Yellowstone vegetation: consequences of environment and history in a natural setting. (1991). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-2095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
