Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extinction: bad genes or bad luck?

·1992·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Part 1 Almost all species are extinct: is extinction important? bad genes or bad luck? the nature of extinction who studies extinction? a word about the word species defined the purpose of extinction, if any. Part 2 A brief history of life: origin of life complex life the quality of the fossil record 600 million years of fussing a stock market analogy trilobite eyes tropical reefs flying reptiles human evolution living fossils. Part 3 Gambler's ruin and other problems: gambling concepts of randomness gambling for survival differing extinction and speciation rates skewed histograms other models a note on extinction of surnames. Part 4 Mass extinctions: the K-T mass extinction measuring extinction a note on killing duration of mass extinctions do mass extinctions differ from background the kill curve. Part 5 Selectivity of extinction: Ice Age Blitzkrieg selectivity of the Blitzkrieg body size and the K-T extinction other examples of bias other examples of selectivity the Trilobites' bad genes some implications summary. Part 6 The search for causes: the rarity of extinction just so stories beware of anthropomorphism! the kill curve revisited. Part 7 Biological causes of extinction: are species and ecosystems fragile? the case of the heath hen importance of the first strike problems of small populations competition species-area effects species-area and past extinctions the great American interchange the history of tropical rain forests. Part 8 Physical causes of extinction: traditional favourites sea level and climate species-area effects testing sea level and climate the Pleistocene experience exotic physical causes unheard-of volcanism cosmic causes. Part 9 Rocks falling out of the sky: cratering rates destructive power Alvarez and the K-T extinction periodicity of extinction and nemesis. Part 10 Could all the extinctions be caused by meteorite impact? plausibility arguments arguments from observation extinctions are linked to craters extinctions are not linked to craters assessment. Part 11 Perspectives on extinction: how to become extinct wanton extinction the role of extinction in evolution bad genes or bad luck? a note on extinctions today. Epilogue: did we choose a safe planet?.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.29-3880

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 562

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1992-03-01
Volume
29
Issue
07
Pages
29-3880-29-3880
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1599898647
Cited by
562
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.29-3880
The paper
Extinction: bad genes or bad luck? (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.29-3880

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.