Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 104Environmental Philosophy and EthicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities

·1992·Choice Reviews Online

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.30-0915

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 104

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1992-10-01
Volume
30
Issue
02
Pages
30-0915-30-0915
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W4301492567
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
conservation biology, species conservation, community-based conservation, ecological balance, biodiversity conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-0915
The paper
The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-0915

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.