Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 719

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure

·1992·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

For fifteen years, Robert Stebbins has conducted extensive research on amateurs and professionals in theatre, music, archaeology, astronomy, baseball, football, magic and stand-up comedy. His publications give theme of in-depth scholarly attention. This text brings together findings of this research project to provide a theoretical framework that reveals commonalities across these eight fields. Throughout this project Stebbins has built on work of Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss and their notion of theory. First, Stebbins extensively observed routine activities of amateurs and professionals in each field studied. Then, as he became more familiar with life-styles of participants, he conducted lengthy, unstructured, face-to-face interviews with, in most cases, 30 amateur or professional respondents. Each field demanded special methods of observation, analysis, interviewing, probing and reporting. As much as possible, however, Stebbins asked similar questions of all respondents in all fields so as to permit generalizations across these diverse fields. The result was a grounded theory of each field studied. Stebbins has developed a formal grounded theory of amateurs and professionals based on research accumulated in all eight substantive fields. By transcending a variety of contexts, he argues, one can gain a more enduring appreciation of elements that affect peoples' experiences in work and pursuits. A review of findings across this wide range of activities, including his findings and ideas on hobbyists and career volunteers, enabled Stebbins to derive better definitions of main concepts of project, such as amateur, the public, and serious leisure -- as well as professional, where he distinguishes between client-centred and public-centred professionals who, while sharing numerous ideal-typical attributes, vary as to power and control they have over their work in a democratic society. He presents inductive conclusions about careers and costs and rewards in eight amateur-professional fields considered. He examines external world of amateurs and professionals in light of such issues as family ties, relations among amateurs and professionals and among amateurs and their employers, public images, critics and journalists, community contributions, and question of marginality for amateurs who are caught between work world of professional and casual world of majority of population. He concludes with an exploration of future role of in relation to predictions of greater unemployment and increased time and longevity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.30-1571

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 719

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1992-11-01
Volume
30
Issue
03
Pages
30-1571-30-1571
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W283155579
Cited by
719
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-1571
The paper
Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.