The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure
Abstract
For fifteen years, Robert Stebbins has conducted extensive research on amateurs and professionals in theatre, music, archaeology, astronomy, baseball, football, magic and stand-up comedy. His publications give theme of in-depth scholarly attention. This text brings together findings of this research project to provide a theoretical framework that reveals commonalities across these eight fields. Throughout this project Stebbins has built on work of Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss and their notion of theory. First, Stebbins extensively observed routine activities of amateurs and professionals in each field studied. Then, as he became more familiar with life-styles of participants, he conducted lengthy, unstructured, face-to-face interviews with, in most cases, 30 amateur or professional respondents. Each field demanded special methods of observation, analysis, interviewing, probing and reporting. As much as possible, however, Stebbins asked similar questions of all respondents in all fields so as to permit generalizations across these diverse fields. The result was a grounded theory of each field studied. Stebbins has developed a formal grounded theory of amateurs and professionals based on research accumulated in all eight substantive fields. By transcending a variety of contexts, he argues, one can gain a more enduring appreciation of elements that affect peoples' experiences in work and pursuits. A review of findings across this wide range of activities, including his findings and ideas on hobbyists and career volunteers, enabled Stebbins to derive better definitions of main concepts of project, such as amateur, the public, and serious leisure -- as well as professional, where he distinguishes between client-centred and public-centred professionals who, while sharing numerous ideal-typical attributes, vary as to power and control they have over their work in a democratic society. He presents inductive conclusions about careers and costs and rewards in eight amateur-professional fields considered. He examines external world of amateurs and professionals in light of such issues as family ties, relations among amateurs and professionals and among amateurs and their employers, public images, critics and journalists, community contributions, and question of marginality for amateurs who are caught between work world of professional and casual world of majority of population. He concludes with an exploration of future role of in relation to predictions of greater unemployment and increased time and longevity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leisure and Subjective Well-Being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors
Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x · Cited by 887
Citizens, science and bird conservation
Greenwood, J. J. D. (2007) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0239-9 · Cited by 323
Progress in sports tourism research? A meta-review and exploration of futures
Weed, M. (2009) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.002 · Cited by 262
Pitts, S. E., & Robinson, K. (2016) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051716000152 · Cited by 85
Running, Being, and Beijing—An Existential Exploration of a Runner Identity
Ronkainen, N. J., Harrison, M. E., & Ryba, T. V. (2014) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.810796 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 30-1571-30-1571
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W283155579
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-1571
- The paper
- Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. (1992). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.