The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Birth as an American rite of passage
Abstract
Why do so many American women allow themselves to become enmeshed in the standardized routines of technocratic childbirth - routines that can be insensitive, unnecessary and even unhealthy? And why, in spite of the natural childbirth movement, has hospital birth become even more intensively technologized? Robbie Davis-Floyd argues that these obstetrical procedures are rituals that enact the core values of American society. Hospital birth, she says, is a rite of passage that reflects and transmits our cultural belief in the superiority of science over nature, machines over bodies, men over women, institutions over individuals. Most women hold these beliefs, and therefore choose such births. Davis-Floyd's interviews with mothers and health care professionals, interpreted from the perspective of symbolic anthropology, reveal both the trauma and the satisfaction women derive from technocratic birth. The author also explores the ritual socialization of obstetricians, showing how their beliefs and choices, too, are culturally constructed. Pointing to the advantages women can gain from technocratic birth, Davis-Floyd also calls for greater cultural and medical tolerance of the alternative beliefs and rituals of home-birthers. Only when the phenomenon of technocratic childbirth is fully understood can women's birth choices be consciously made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1991) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.20.100191.001523 · Cited by 614
The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth
Davis‐Floyd, R. (2001) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00510-0 · Cited by 538
Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review
Dencker, A., Nilsson, C., Begley, C., Jangsten, E., Mollberg, M., Patel, H., Wigert, H., Hessman, E., Sjöblom, H., & Sparud-Lundin, C. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004 · Cited by 438
Men's influences on women's reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives
Dudgeon, M. R., & Inhorn, M. C. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.035 · Cited by 377
The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression
Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1994) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)90228-3 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 30-3887-30-3887
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2017655128
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birth as an American rite of passage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-3887
- The paper
- Birth as an American rite of passage. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-3887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.