The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody
Abstract
Questions about how children fare in divided families have become as perplexing and urgent as they are common. In this work on custody arrangements, the developmental psychologist Eleanor Maccoby and the legal scholar Robert Mnookin consider these questions and their ramifications for society. This book examines the social and legal realities of how divorcing parents make arrangements for their children, Dividing the Child is based on a large, representative study of families from a wide range of socioeconomic levels. Maccoby and Mnookin followed a group of more than 1000 families for three years after the parents file for divorce. Their findings show how different divorce agreements are reached, from the uncontested dealings to formal judicial rulings, and how various custody arrangements fare as time passes and family circumstances change. Numerous examples of joint custody and father custody are considered in this account, along with the mother-custody families more commonly studied; and in most cases the point of view of both parents is presented. After the divorce, most children spent time in both parental households. The authors identify three different patterns of co-parenting: cooperative, conflicted and disengaged. They explain why post-divorce conflict rarely involves formal legal disputes, although parents have difficulty in establishing effective parental cooperation. This book should be invaluable to the lawyers, judges, social workers and parents who, more and more often, must make wise and informed decisions concerning the welfare and care of children and divorce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Barber (2005) · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2005.00365.x · Cited by 1,063
The Adjustment of Children with Divorced Parents: A Risk and Resiliency Perspective
Hetherington, E. M., & Stanley-Hagan, M. (1999) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1017/s0021963098003394 · Cited by 522
Fagan, J., & Barnett, M. (2003) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x03256397 · Cited by 451
Juby, H., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil‐Gratton, N. (2005) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00012.x · Cited by 133
Cautionary notes on the shared care of children in conflicted parental separation
McIntosh, J., & Chisholm, R. (2008) · Journal of Family Studies · doi:10.5172/jfs.327.14.1.37 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 30-4122-30-4122
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2053586351
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.30-4122
- The paper
- Dividing the child: social and legal dilemmas of custody. (1993). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-4122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.