Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interpretation of mass spectra

·1994·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

1. Introduction 2. Elemental Composition 3. The Molecular Ion 4. Basic Mechanisms of Ion Fragmentation 5. Postulation of Molecular Structures 6. Auxiliary Techniques 7. Theory of Unimolecular Ion Decompositions 8. Detailed Mechanisms of Ion Fragmentation 9. Mass Spectra of Common Compound Classes 10.Computer Identification of Unknown Mass Spectra 11.Solutions to Unknowns Bibliography Appendix Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.31-2693

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
31
Issue
05
Pages
31-2693-31-2693
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W4300907493
Cited by
498
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of mass spectra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-2693
The paper
Interpretation of mass spectra. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-2693

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.