Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The path to dropping out: evidence for intervention

·1994·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Introduction and Overview The Policy Context: A Profile of the High School Dropout Problem School Dropouts: A Literature Review Examining the Relationship Between School Experiences and School Dropout: The Fall River Survey What Do the School Careers of Dropouts and Graduates Look Like? School Transitions and School Dropout: A Model for Investigating the Impact of School Transitions Grade Retention and School Dropout: Investigating the Association The Two Dropout Problems: A Framework for Dropout Prevention Policy Policy and Research Implications Appendixes Bibliography Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.31-2815

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
31
Issue
05
Pages
31-2815-31-2815
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W565319145
Cited by
210
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The path to dropping out: evidence for intervention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-2815
The paper
The path to dropping out: evidence for intervention. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-2815

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.