The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism
Abstract
Part 1 Introduction: an introduction to the debate early understanding of mind - the normal case social development in autism - historical and clinical perspectives. Part 2 The theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism - the cognitive approach: from attention-goal psychology to belief-desire psychology - the development of a theory of mind and its dysfunction what autism teaches us about metarepresentation the theory-of-mind deficit in autism - rethinking the metarepresentation theory what language reveals about the understanding of minds in children with autism the theory-of-mind deficit in autism - evidence from deception. Part 3 The theory-of-minds hypothesis of autism - critical perspectives: the theory-of-mind and joint-attention deficits in autism understanding persons - the role of affect pretending and planning narrative language in autism and the theory-of-mind hypothesis - a wider perspective theories of mind and the problem of autism the complexity of social behaviour in autism the development of individuals with autism - implications for the theory-of-mind hypothesis. Part 4 Wider perspectives: the role of imitation in understanding persons and developing a theory of mind evolving a theory of mind - the nature of non-verbal mentalism in other primates the comparative study of early communication and theories of mind - ontogeny, phylogeny and pathology autism and the theory of mind - some philosophical perspectives desire and fantasy - a psychoanalytic perspective on the theory of mind and autism the theory-of-mind deficit in autism - some questions for teaching and diagnosis the place of this book in autism research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meta-Analysis of Theory-of-Mind Development: The Truth about False Belief
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00304 · Cited by 4,476
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
The functional architecture of human empathy
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004) · Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews · doi:10.1177/1534582304267187 · Cited by 3,407
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1994-02-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 31-3492-31-3492
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1635900978
- Cited by
- 1,649
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-3492
- The paper
- Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-3492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.