The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hope and dread in psychoanalysis
Abstract
The Analytic Situation * What Does the Patient Need? A Revolution Theory * What Does the Analyst Know? A Revolution in Metatheory * The Two Revolutions Together Self In Psychoanalysis * Multiple Selves, Singular Self * True Selves, False Selves, and the Ambiguity of Authenticity * Aggression and the Endangered Self The Analytic Relationship * Wishes, Needs, and Interpersonal Negotiations * The Dialectics of Hope
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Awakening the Dreamer: Clinical Journeys
Benjamin, J. (2007) · Contemporary Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/00107530.2007.10745939 · Cited by 396
Zilcha-Mano, S. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040435 · Cited by 303
Processing the therapeutic relationship
Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300802621206 · Cited by 211
The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions.
Horvath, A. O. (2006) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.258 · Cited by 189
Nissen-Lie, H. A., Monsen, J. T., Ulleberg, P., & Rønnestad, M. H. (2013) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.735775 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1994-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 31-4076-31-4076
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1735349938
- Cited by
- 1,017
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.31-4076
- The paper
- Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-4076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
