Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 829

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hazardous waste management

·1994·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

I Fundamentals1 Hazardous Waste2 The Legal Framework3 Process Fundamentals4 Fate and Transport of Contaminants5 ToxicologyII Current Management Practices6 Environmental Audits7 Pollution Prevention8 Facility Development and OperationsIII Treatment and Disposal Methods9 Physicochemical Processes10 Biological Methods11 Stabilization and Solidification12 Thermal Methods13 Land DisposalIV Site Remediation14 Quantitative Risk Assessment15 Site and Subsurface Characterization16 Remedial Technologies17 Evaluation and Selection of Remedial Actions and Corrective MeasuresAppendixesA Basel ConventionB Contaminant PropertiesC Thermodynamic PropertiesD Conversion Factors

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.32-0330

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 829

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1994-09-01
Volume
32
Issue
01
Pages
32-0330-32-0330
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1552714455
Cited by
829
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hazardous waste management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-0330
The paper
Hazardous waste management. (1994). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-0330

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.