The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives
Abstract
Introduction Environmental Influences Organizational Influences Purposes of Performance Appraisals Obtaining Information about Performance Standards for Judging Performance Processes in Evaluative Judgment Rater Goals Rater Motivation Error and Accuracy Measures Criteria That Reflect the Uses of Ratings Does Performance Appraisal Help or Hurt the Organization? Performance Appraisal and the Changing Context of Work and Organizations Designing, Implementing and Evaluating a Goal-Oriented Appraisal System Directions for Research and Practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729
Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda
Johns, G. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.630 · Cited by 1,285
Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762 · Cited by 762
Job Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover
Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306297582 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1995-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 32-5748-32-5748
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1641623641
- Cited by
- 1,088
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.32-5748
- The paper
- Understanding performance appraisal: social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. (1995). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.32-5748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
