The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Oxford companion to philosophy
Abstract
Oxford University Press presents a major new edition of the definitive philosophical reference work for readers at all levels. For ten years the original volume has served as a stimulating introduction for general readers and as an indispensable guide for students; its breadth and depth of coverage have ensured that it is also read with pleasure and interest by those working at a higher level in philosophy and related disciplines. A distinguished international assembly of 249 philosophers contributed almost 2,000 entries, and many of these have now been considerably revised and updated; to these are added over 300 brand-new pieces on a fascinating range of current topics. This new edition offers enlightening and enjoyable discussions of all aspects of philosophy, and of the lives and work of the great philosophers from antiquity to the present day.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies
van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E., Nijland, N., van Limburg, M., Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., Eysenbach, G., & Seydel, E. R. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1672 · Cited by 1,126
Democracy compromised: chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-6058 · Cited by 226
Reflections on activity theory
Bakhurst, D. (2009) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131910902846916 · Cited by 184
The Price of Truth: How Money Affects the Norms of Science
Resnik, D. B. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309782.001.0001 · Cited by 160
Post-positivist Review of Technology Acceptance Model.
University of Houston, & Silva, L. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00121 · Cited by 120
Delayed transfer from hospital to community settings: The older person’s perspective
Swinkels, A., & Mitchell, T. (2009) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2008.00796.x · Cited by 65
High value information in engineering organisations
Zhao, Y., Tang, L. C. M., Darlington, M. J., Austin, S. A., & Culley, S. J. (2008) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.09.007 · Cited by 46
Blancke, S., De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2012) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-011-9402-z · Cited by 39
Towards a political ontology of state power: a comment on Colin Hay's article
Jessop, B. (2014) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12087 · Cited by 22
Untitled work
Laumakis, S. J. (2008)
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 33-2495-33-2495
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1531132210
- Cited by
- 1,544
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
