The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research
Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780040200800103 · Cited by 4,257
Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167272 · Cited by 2,288
Windschitl, M. (2002) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543072002131 · Cited by 1,118
The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x028007015 · Cited by 1,139
Picower, B. (2009) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613320902995475 · Cited by 871
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 33-2868-33-2868
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1520372519
- Cited by
- 581
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.33-2868
- The paper
- Multicultural education, critical pedagogy, and the politics of difference. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-2868
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
