Cited by 4,103Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children

·1996·Choice Reviews Online

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.33-3435

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socioeconomic disparities are associated with children's language skills as well as parental behaviors such as linguistic input and sensitivity.

    “socioeconomic disparities are associated with children ' s language skills 9,27 as well as parental behaviors such as linguistic input and sensitivity. 28,29”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4,103

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1996-02-01
Volume
33
Issue
06
Pages
33-3435-33-3435
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W4298742451
Cited by
4,103
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 118 · 2024: 163 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 242 · 2021: 260 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 319 · 2018: 254 · 2017: 242 · 2016: 300 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 190 · 2013: 190 · 2012: 153
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
young children, everyday experience, child development, early childhood, children's lives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review