The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conservation biology in theory and practice
Abstract
IntroductionThe Units Of ConservationExtinctions In PrehistoryHistorical Extinctions And Near ExtinctionsThe Risks Faced By Small PopulationsPopulation Viability AnalysisDiagnosis Of DeclinesTreatment Of DeclinesHabitat Change And FragmentationThe Role Of ReservesConservation And EconomicsLegislation And TreatiesRecovery PlansConclusions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges
Strayer, D. L., & Dudgeon, D. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-171.1 · Cited by 1,752
On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management
Beissinger, S. R., & Westphal, M. I. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802534 · Cited by 1,118
Have the Harmful Effects of Introduced Rats on Islands been Exaggerated?
Towns, D. R., Atkinson, I. A. E., & Daugherty, C. H. (2006) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-005-0421-z · Cited by 584
Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising
Inger, R., Gregory, R., Duffy, J. P., Stott, I., Voříšek, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12387 · Cited by 489
Carrying capacity of large African predators: Predictions and tests
Hayward, M. W., O’Brien, J., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.018 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 33-3888-33-3888
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2021727968
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation biology in theory and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.33-3888
- The paper
- Conservation biology in theory and practice. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-3888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
