The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stone tools: theoretical insights into human prehistory
Abstract
Recent Trends in Lithic Analysis. Theoreticians Enter Orbit. A Call to Merge Theory and Practice. Part I.: Research Design. Evaluating Lithic Strategies and Design Criteria B. Hayden, et al.Part II: Curation. Economizing Behavior and the Concept of 'Curation' G.H. Odell. Is Curation a Useful Heuristic? S.E. Nash. Hunter-Gatherer Lithic Economy and Settlement Systems: Understanding Regional Assemblage Variability in the Upper Paleolithic of Portuguese Estremadura P.T. Thacker. Part III.: Stone Tools and Complex Societies. The Decline and Fall of Flint S.A. Rosen. Lithic Analysis and Questions of Cultural Complexity: The Maya J.K. Johnson. The Role of Chipped Stone in the Political Economy of Social Ranking M.S. Nassaney.Part IV.: Innovation and Style in Projectile Points. When Is an Elko? M.R. Rondeau. Projectile Points, Style and Social Process in the Preceramic of Central Peru J.W. Rick. Innovation and Selection in Prehistory: A Case Study from the American Bottom M.J. Shott.Part V: Technique and Methodology. Microwear Analysis of Some Clovis and Experimental Chipped Stone Tools M. Kay. Lithic Refitting and Archaeological Site Formation Processes: A Case Study from the Twin Ditch Site, Greene County, Illinois T.A. Morrow.Part VI: Conclusion. A Discussion of Seemingly Important Issues G.H. Odell, et al. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Behavioral Ecology and Archaeology
Bird, D. W., & O’Connell, J. F. (2006) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-006-9003-6 · Cited by 296
Use-Wear Analysis of Nonflint Lithic Raw Materials: The Cases of Quartz/Quartzite and Obsidian
Clemente Conte, I., Lazuén Fernández, T., Astruc, L., & Rodríguez Rodríguez, A. C. (2015) · Manuals in Archaeological Method, Theory and Technique · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08257-8_5 · Cited by 54
Isotopes and rocks: geographical organisation of southern Patagonian hunter‐gatherers
Borrero, L. A., Barberena, R., Franco, N. V., Charlin, J., & Tykot, R. H. (2009) · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/oa.1036 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 34-0376-34-0376
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W644941273
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stone tools: theoretical insights into human prehistory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-0376
- The paper
- Stone tools: theoretical insights into human prehistory. (1996). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-0376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
