Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,522

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition

·1997·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Refuting argument to choose between the of and politics of redistribution, Justice Interruptus integrates best aspects of both. ********************************************************* ** What does it mean to think critically about at a time when inequality is increasing worldwide, when struggles for recognition of difference are eclipsing struggles for social equality, and when we lack any credible vision of an alternative to present order? Philosopher Nancy Fraser claims that key is to overcome false oppositions of postsocialist commonsense. Refuting view that we must choose between the of and politics of redistribution, Fraser argues for an integrative approach that encompasses best aspects of both.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.34-6523

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,522

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
34-6523-34-6523
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2031366078
Cited by
2,522
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.34-6523
The paper
Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition. (1997). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-6523

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.