The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach
Abstract
Preface. List of Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in the Text. Part One: Introduction. 1. The Conservation of Botanical Diversity G.T. Prance. 2. Complementary Conservation Strategies N. Maxted, et al. Part Two: Theory and Practice of in situ Conservation. 3. Selection of Target Taxa N. Maxted, J.G. Hawkes. 4. Ecogeographic Surveys N. Maxted, L. Guarino. 5. Technical and Political Factor Constraining Reserve Placement J.T. Williams. 6. Plant Population Genetics M.J. Lawrence, D.F. Marshall. 7. Plant Population Ecology M. Gillman. 8. Reserve Design J.G. Hawkes, et al. 9. Management and Monitoring N. Maxted, et al. 10. Locally Based Crop Plant Conservation C.O. Qualset, et al. 11. Genetic Conservation Information Management B.V. Ford-Lloyd, N. Maxted. 12. Estimation of Genetic Diversity H.J. Newbury, B.V. Ford-Lloyd. 13. Conserving the Genetic Resources of Trees in situ P. Kanowski, D. Boshier. 14. Integrating Plant and Insect Conservation V. Keesing, S.D. Wratten. Part Three: Case Studies. 15. The Ammiad Experiment Y. Anikster, et al. 16. In situ Conservation of Genetic Diversity in Turkey A. Ertug Firat, A. Tan. 17. Genetic Conservation: a Role for Rice Farmers M.R. Bellon, et al. 18. Ethiopian in situ Conservation M. Worede. 19. Peruvian in situ Conservation of Andean Crops R. Ortega. 20. Central Asian in situ Conservation of Wild Relatives of Cultivated Plants N. Lunyova, T. Ulyanova. 21. Plant Conservation In Situ for Disease Resistance A. Dinoor, N. Eshed. Part Four: Discussion. 22. A Practical Model for in situ Genetic Conservation N. Maxted, et al. 24. Towards the Future G.C. Hawtin, T. Hodgkin. References. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity
Khoury, C. K., Brush, S., Costich, D. E., Curry, H. A., de Haan, S., Engels, J. M. M., Guarino, L., Hoban, S., Mercer, K. L., Miller, A. J., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17733 · Cited by 471
Towards a definition of a crop wild relative
Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Jury, S., Kell, S., & Scholten, M. (2006) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-005-5409-6 · Cited by 355
Distribution of Agrobiodiversity in Home Gardens along the Corrientes River, Peruvian Amazon
Perrault-Archambault, M., & Coomes, O. T. (2008) · Economic Botany · doi:10.1007/s12231-008-9010-2 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 35-0896-35-0896
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1779664042
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.35-0896
- The paper
- Plant genetic conservation: the in situ approach. (1997). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-0896
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.