The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward a history of epistemic things: synthesizing proteins in the test tube
Abstract
Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century
Rose, N. (2007) · doi:10.1515/9781400827503 · Cited by 3,294
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392759 · Cited by 3,179
How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies
Latour, B. (2004) · Body & Society · doi:10.1177/1357034x04042943 · Cited by 1,367
Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716 · Cited by 1,258
Knowledge Building: Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2005) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.008 · Cited by 1,159
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 35-3290-35-3290
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W631723770
- Cited by
- 1,752
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a history of epistemic things: synthesizing proteins in the test tube. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.35-3290
- The paper
- Toward a history of epistemic things: synthesizing proteins in the test tube. (1998). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-3290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
