Cited by 377Humor Studies and ApplicationsAmerican Literature and Humor StudiesComics and Graphic Narratives

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The game of humor: a comprehensive theory of why we laugh

·1998·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Humor, wit, and laughter surround each person. From everyday quips to the carefully contrived comedy of literature, newspapers, and television we experience humor in many forms, yet the impetus for our laughter is far from innocuous. Misfortune, stupidity, and moral or cultural defects, however faintly revealed in others and ourselves, seem to make us laugh. Although discomforting, such negative terms as superiority, aggression, hostility, ridicule, or degradation can be applied to instances of humor. According to scholars, Thomas Hobbes's theory--that humor arises from mischances, infirmities, and indecencies, where there is no wit at all--applies to most humor. With the exception of play, Charles R. Gruner claims that humor is rarely as innocent as it first appears. Gruner's proposed superiority theory of humor is all-encompassing. In The Game of Humor, he expands the scope of Hobbes's theory to include and explore the contest aspect of good-natured play. As such, the author believes all instances of humor can be examined as games, in terms of competition and keeping score--winners and losers. Gruner draws on a broad spectrum of thought-provoking examples. Holocaust jokes, sexual humor, the racialist dialogue of such comic characters as Stepin Fetchit and Archie Bunker, simple puns, and many of the author's own encounters with everyday humor. Gruner challenges the reader to offer a single example of humor that cannot be de-humorized by its agonistic nature. The Game of Humo…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.35-4189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
35
Issue
07
Pages
35-4189-35-4189
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1833933305
Cited by
375
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › American Literature and Humor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Comics and Graphic Narratives
Keywords
humor, laughter, Thomas Hobbes, play, competition, games, jokes, sexual humor, puns, motives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review