The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restoration ecology and sustainable development
Abstract
Foreword Pehr Enckell Acknowledgements Introduction 1. Why restoration? Krystyna M. Urbanska, Nigel R. Webb and Peter J. Edwards 2. What do we mean by restoration? Anthony D. Bradshaw Part I. Ecological Basis of Restoration: 3. Restoration as an ecosystem process: implications of the modern ecological paradigm V. Thomas Parker and Steward T. A. Pickett 4. Importance of soil ecology in restoration science A. D. Bradshaw 5. Soil microorganisms, mycorrhiza and restoration ecology Kurt Haselwandter 6. Safe sites - interface of plant population ecology and restoration ecology Krystyna M. Urbanska 7. The role of plant-animal mutualism in the design and restoration of natural communities Steven N. Handel 8. The development of criteria for ecological restoration Nigel R. Webb Part II. The Implementation and Assessment of Restoration Schemes: 9. Restoring alpine ecosystems in the United States: environmental constraints, disturbance characteristics and restoration success Jeanne C. Chambers 10. Restoration of eroded areas in Iceland Sigurdur H. Marnusson 11. Invertebrates assist the restoration process: an Australian perspective Jonathan D. Majer 12. Terrestrial arthropods as ecological indicators of habitat restoration in southwestern North America K. S. Williams 13. Tidal wetland restoration and creation along the east coast of North America William A. Niering 14. Options for restoration and management of coastal salt marshes in Europe Jan P. Bakker, Peter Esselink, Rene van der Wal and Kees S. Dijkema Part III. Ecological Restoration, Economics and Sustainability: 15. Ecological engineering and sustainable development Peter J. Edwards, and Cyrus Abivardi 16. Ecological restoration - the magnitude of the challenge: an outsider's view Michael Clark Part IV. Conclusions: 17. Restoration ecology: science, technology and society Peter J. Edwards, Nigel R. Webb, Krystyna M. Urbanska and Reinhard Bornkamm Taxonomic index Subject index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
Klironomos, J. N. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0413 · Cited by 1,213
Restoration Ecology: Repairing the Earth’s Ecosystems in the New Millennium
Hobbs, R. J., & Harris, J. A. (2001) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002239.x · Cited by 905
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
The use of natural processes in reclamation - advantages and difficulties
Bradshaw, A. (2000) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00099-2 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 36-1564-36-1564
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1606688126
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoration ecology and sustainable development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-1564
- The paper
- Restoration ecology and sustainable development. (1998). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-1564
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.