The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parks in peril: people, politics, and protected areas
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts
S., W. (2005) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/001760 · Cited by 1,535
Exploring the forest--poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications
A., A., & S., W. (2003) · doi:10.17528/cifor/001211 · Cited by 554
Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly
Coria, J., & Calfucura, E. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.024 · Cited by 419
Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world
Mcdonald, R. I., Forman, R. T. T., Kareiva, P., Neugarten, R., Salzer, D., & Fisher, J. (2009) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.002 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 36-4477-36-4477
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4214917605
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parks in peril: people, politics, and protected areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-4477
- The paper
- Parks in peril: people, politics, and protected areas. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-4477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
