The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race
Abstract
PrefaceChapter 1. Non-Cartesian Sums: Philosophy and the African-American ExperienceChapter 2. Alternative EpistemologiesChapter 3. But What Are You Really?' The Metaphysics of RaceChapter 4. Dark Ontologies: Blacks, Jews, and White SupremacyChapter 5. Revisionist Ontologies: Theorizing White SupremacyChapter 6. The Racial PolityChapter 7. White Right: The Idea of a Herrenvolk EthicsChapter 8. Whose Fourth of July? Frederick Douglass and Original IntentNotes Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research.
Ford, C. L., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.030 · Cited by 757
Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance
Pohlhaus, G. (2012) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x · Cited by 745
Edwards, C. L., Fillingim, R. B., & Keefe, F. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00408-0 · Cited by 494
Mason, R. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01175.x · Cited by 265
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 36-5615-36-5615
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1512087303
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.36-5615
- The paper
- Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race. (1999). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-5615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
