The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture: the anthropologists' account
Open accessAbstract
In Culture, Adam Kuper pursues the concept of culture from the early-20th century debates about its adoption by American social science under the tutelage of Talcott Parsons. What follows is the story of how the idea fared within American anthropology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ehrlich, P. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030194 · Cited by 154
Akpa-Inyang, F., & Chima, S. C. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00678-4 · Cited by 67
Neo‐pluralism as a theoretical framework for understanding HRM in sub‐Saharan Africa
Khan, A. S., & Ackers, P. (2004) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519042000238482 · Cited by 41
Cultural citizenship as a normative notion for activist practices
Boele van Hensbroek, P. (2010) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621021003731880 · Cited by 22
Deconstructing ‘Western esotericism’: on Wouter Hanegraaff's Esotericism and the Academy
Hammer, O. (2013) · Religion · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2013.767609 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 37-2854-37-2854
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2040092624
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Culture: the anthropologists' account. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-2854
- The paper
- Culture: the anthropologists' account. (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-2854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
