Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pillar of sand: can the irrigation miracle last?

·2000·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

In the beginning, all agriculture was organic.Then came the pressure sprayer, the sack of fertiliser and the Green Revolution.And agriculture became 'intensive', to meet the challenge of feeding mankind.In the end, the ecological pyramid got skewed and pushed off-balance.Any farmer in the world who knows her or his land can tell you that, as Joël de Rosnay 1 put it, "an ecosystem which is off-balance will spontaneously seek to become more complex, increasing its load of insects and weeds, which farmers in turn will seek to control by increasing their use of pesticides and weedkillers".Not all farmers do it though.Four out of five farmers in the world, mainly in the South, are subsistence farmers and only have the means to plant their crops and hope that their harvest will feed their family.And one farmer in a hundred, mainly in the North, has deliberately Put simply…• The market for organic produce is a promising one, but it is limited.• Organic farming methods carry no miracles, but they do, by and large, help sustainability.• 'Sound' agriculture is a way of applying these methods pragmatically, and profitably, for the benefit of the largest possibe number of farmers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.37-3373

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
06
Pages
37-3373-37-3373
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2046534258
Cited by
409
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pillar of sand: can the irrigation miracle last? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-3373
The paper
Pillar of sand: can the irrigation miracle last? (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-3373

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.