The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier
Abstract
The Amazon, the world's largest rain forest, is the last frontier in Brazil. The settlement of large and small farmers, squatters, miners, and loggers in this frontier during the past thirty years has given rise to violent conflicts over land as well as environmental duress. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use examines the institutional development involved in the process of land use and ownership in the Amazon and shows how this phenomenon affects the behavior of the economic actors. It explores the way in which the absence of well-defined property rights in the Amazon has led to both economic and social problems, including lost investment opportunities, high costs in protecting claims, and violence. The relationship between land reform and violence is given special attention. The book offers an important application of the New Institutional Economics by examining a rare instance where institutional change can be empirically observed. This allows the authors to study property rights as they emerge and evolve and to analyze the effects of Amazon development on the economy. In doing so they illustrate well the point that often the evolution of economic institutions will not lead to efficient outcomes. This book will be important not only to economists but also to Latin Americanists, political scientists, anthropologists, and scholars in disciplines concerned with the environment. Lee Alston is Professor of Economics, University of Illinois, and Research Associate for the National Bureau of Economic Research. Gary Libecap is Professor of Economics and Law, University of Arizona, and Research Associate for the National Bureau of Economic Research. Bernardo Mueller is Assistant Professor, Universidade de Brasilia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective
Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6 · Cited by 775
Nepstad, D. C., Stickler, C. M., Filho, B. S., & Merry, F. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0036 · Cited by 725
The Evolution of the World Bank's Land Policy: Principles, Experience, and Future Challenges
Deinlnger, K., & Binswanger, H. (1999) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/14.2.247 · Cited by 444
Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D., & Mueller, B. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1103 · Cited by 369
The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., & Grainger, A. (2010) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.001 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 37-3996-37-3996
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W428382510
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-3996
- The paper
- Titles, conflict, and land use: the development of property rights and land reform on the Brazilian Amazon frontier. (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-3996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.