The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life
Abstract
Preface Chapter One The Ethics of Sexual Shame Chapter Two What's Wrong with Normal? Chapter Three Beyond Gay Marriage Chapter Four Zoning Out Sex Conclusion The Politics of Shame and HIV Prevention Notes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2012.730511 · Cited by 1,272
Is kinship always already heterosexual?
BUTLER, J. (2002) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-13-1-14 · Cited by 715
(2003) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) · Cited by 640
DEVIANCE AS RESISTANCE: A New Research Agenda for the Study of Black Politics
Cohen, C. J. (2004) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x04040044 · Cited by 539
Desiring Sameness? The Rise of a Neoliberal Politics of Normalisation
Richardson, D. (2005) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00509.x · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 37-5738-37-5738
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W566531835
- Cited by
- 2,590
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.37-5738
- The paper
- The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. (2000). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-5738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.