The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade
Abstract
This work covers the field of conservation biology and discusses where the discipline stands and how to prioritize research options for the next decade. It is an outgrowth of a conference sponsored by the Society for Conservation Biology. One important goal of this work is to try to prioritize research needs and maximize effectiveness of funding for the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation
Ewers, R. M., & Didham, R. K. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006949 · Cited by 2,218
Monitoring does not always count
McDonald-Madden, E., Baxter, P. W. J., Fuller, R. A., Martin, T. G., Game, E. T., Montambault, J., & Possingham, H. P. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.002 · Cited by 300
Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N., & Brown, M. (2009) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.007 · Cited by 184
Suski, C. D., & Cooke, S. J. (2007) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-006-9060-7 · Cited by 169
Rödder, D., Nekum, S., Cord, A. F., & Engler, J. O. (2016) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0698-y · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 39-3954-39-3954
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1481546449
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.39-3954
- The paper
- Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. (2002). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-3954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
