Cited by 111Historical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesMedieval Literature and HistoryMedieval and Early Modern Justice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Battling demons: witchcraft, heresy, and reform in the late Middle Ages

Bailey, Michael D.·2003·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

The fifteenth century is more than any other the century of the persecution of witches. So wrote Johan Huizinga more than eighty years ago in his classic Autumn of the Middle Ages. Although Huizinga was correct in his observation, modern readers have tended to focus on the more spectacular witch-hunts of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Nevertheless, it was during the late Middle Ages that the full stereotype of demonic witchcraft developed in Europe, and this is the subject of Battling Demons. At the heart of the story is Johannes Nider (d. 1438), a Dominican theologian and reformer who alternately persecuted heretics and negotiated with them—a man who was by far the most important church authority to write on witchcraft in the early fifteenth century. Nider was a major source for the infamous Malleus maleficarum, or Hammer of Witches (1486), the manual of choice for witch-hunters in late medieval Europe. Today Nider's reputation rests squarely on his witchcraft writings, but in his own day he was better known as a leader of the reform movement within the Dominican order and as a writer of important tracts on numerous other aspects of late medieval religiosity, including heresy and lay piety. Battling Demons places Nider in this wider context, showing that for late medieval thinkers, witchcraft was one facet of a much larger crisis plaguing Christian society.\nAs the only English-language study to focus exclusively on the rise of witchcraft in the early fifteenth century, Battling Demons will be important to students and scholars of the history of magic and witchcraft and medieval religious history.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.41-0614

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Bailey, M. D.
Corresponding author
Bailey, Michael D.
Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
41
Issue
01
Pages
41-0614-41-0614
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2501630218
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 27 · 2013: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Michigan Library Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
Keywords
witchcraft, heresy, Johannes Nider, Malleus Maleficarum, witch hunts, 15th century, history of magic, Johan Huizinga

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Battling demons: witchcraft, heresy, and reform in the late Middle Ages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-0614
The paper
Bailey, M. D. (2003). Battling demons: witchcraft, heresy, and reform in the late Middle Ages. Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-0614