The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy
Abstract
Shrader-Frechette offers a rigorous philosophical discussion of environmental justice. Explaining fundamental ethical concepts such as equality, property rights, procedural justice, free informed consent, intergenerational equity, and just compensation-and then bringing them to bear on real-world social issues-she shows how many of these core concepts have been compromised for a large segment of the global population, among them Appalachians, African-Americans, workers in hazardous jobs, and indigenous people in developing nations. She argues that burdens like pollution and resource depletion need to be apportioned more equally, and that there are compelling ethical grounds for remedying our environmental problems. She also argues that those affected by environmental problems must be included in the process of remedying those problems; that all citizens have a duty to engage in activism on behalf of Environmental Justice; and that in a democracy it is the people, not the government, that are ultimately responsible for fair use of the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland
Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600903102949 · Cited by 828
Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research
Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., Aylett, A., Debats, J., Goh, K., Schenk, T., Seto, K. C., Dodman, D., Roberts, D., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2841 · Cited by 656
Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization
Paavola, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.026 · Cited by 578
Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments
Dombrowski, L., Harmon, E., & Fox, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems · doi:10.1145/2901790.2901861 · Cited by 432
Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy
Stevis, D., & Felli, R. (2015) · International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9266-1 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 41-0897-41-0897
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1987457905
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-0897
- The paper
- Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-0897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.