Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10,543

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers

Open access
·2003·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

This textbook, edited by Jane Ritchie and Jane Lewis, is meant for both students and researchers, but because it primarily presents basic knowledge it is more suitablefor students. It is intended to lead practitioners throughthe process of qualitative research, i.e. from the design of astudy, conducting of in-depth interviews and analysis of datato the presentation of results. The authors impart in a professionalway both broad theoretical knowledge and practice-oriented information. They do not provide the readerwith an overview of qualitative methods, but focus on indepthinterviews and so-called focus groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.41-1319

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 10,543

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
41
Issue
03
Pages
41-1319-41-1319
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1589275176
Cited by
10,543
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-1319
The paper
Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.