The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Group creativity: music, theater, collaboration
Abstract
Group Creativity explores the unique form of creativity that emerges from collaborating groups. Dr. Sawyer draws on his studies of jazz ensembles and improvisational theater groups to develop a model of creative group processes. He applies this model of group creativity to a wide range of collaborating groups, including group learning in classrooms and innovative teams in organizations. In group creativity, a group comes together to collaboratively create in real time. The creative inspiration emerges from the interaction and communication among the members, and makes the result more than the sum of its parts. The dynamic, moment-to-moment communication among jazz musicians and improvising actors is the primary topic of the book. Sawyer explores performers' close listening and sensitivity, the submerging of the ego to the group mind, and the ways that performers work together to create something better than and different from what one solitary individual could create alone. These explorations provide insight into all forms of group creativity and collaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together
Noy, L., Dekel, E., & Alon, U. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1108155108 · Cited by 317
Simonton, D. K. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002 · Cited by 261
Being in the zone: physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation
Noy, L., Levit-Binun, N., & Golland, Y. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00187 · Cited by 148
Group Pleasures: Collaborative Commitments, Shared Narrative, and the Sociology of Fun
Fine, G. A., & Corte, U. (2017) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275117692836 · Cited by 94
Group music composing strategies: A case study within a rock band
Biasutti, M. (2012) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051712000289 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 41-1867-41-1867
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W569196555
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group creativity: music, theater, collaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-1867
- The paper
- Group creativity: music, theater, collaboration. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.