Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Progressive Muslims on justice, gender and pluralism

·2003·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Part 1 Progressive Muslims and contemporary Islam: the ugly modern and the modern ugly - reclaiming the beautiful in Islam, Khaled Abou El Fadl in search of a progressive Islamic response to 9/11, Farid Esack Islam - a civilisational project in progress, Ahmet Karamustafa the debts and burdens of critical Islam, Ebrahim Moosa on being a scholar of Islam - risks and responsibilities, Tazim R. Kassam. Part 2 Progressive Muslims and gender justice: transforming feminisms - Islam, women and gender justice, Sa'diyya Shaikh progressive Muslims and Islamic jurisprudence - the necessity for critical engagement with marriage and divorce laws, Kecia Ali sexuality, diversity and ethics in the agenda of progressive Muslims, Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle are we up to the challenge? the need for a radical re-ordering of the Islamic discourse on women, Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons. Part 3 Progressive Muslims and pluralism: Muslims, pluralism and inter-faith dialogue, Amir Hussein Islam, democracy and pluralism, Ahmad S. Moussalli American Muslim identity - race and ethnicity in progressive Islam, Amina Wadud how to put the genie back in the bottle? Identity, Islam and Muslim youth cultures in america, Marcia Hermansen what is the victory of Islam? towards a different understanding of the Ummah and political success in the contemporary world, Farish A. Noor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.41-2131

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
41
Issue
04
Pages
41-2131-41-2131
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W588754426
Cited by
440
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progressive Muslims on justice, gender and pluralism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-2131
The paper
Progressive Muslims on justice, gender and pluralism. (2003). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-2131

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.