The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 63 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Souls of the city: religion and the search for community in postwar America
Abstract
Preliminary Table of Contents: Preface 1. An Introduction to Metropolitan Growth and Religious Change 2. Hi, Neighbor!: Building New Religious Communities in Suburbia 3. From Small Town to Mall Town: Rural Communities and their Congregations 4. What is Our Community?: The Dilemma of the Inner City Congregation 5. Tying the Metropolis Together 6. Finding Community in the Modern Metropolis Notes Bibliography Index
Overview
CoChat Summary
Written by AI from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
Etan Diamond argues that postwar metropolitan growth in Indianapolis reshaped the religious landscape, but that religious congregations remained vital sites of community even as they became geographically dispersed. He contends that "community" in the metropolis has never been singular or purely inclusive—congregations both gather and exclude, and members increasingly commute across the region to worship.
Key findings
- Suburbanization produced a boom in new congregations, but conservative Protestant, Pentecostal, and Holiness groups—not mainline denominations—dominated it: of 191 new suburban congregations formed in Marion County between 1941 and 1970, 58 percent were conservative Protestant/Pentecostal/Holiness and only 29 percent mainline Protestant.
- Inner-city racial turnover was dramatic and connected to congregational relocation: Center Township went from 30 percent African American in 1940 to 70 percent by 1970, and the 35 congregations that relocated out of Center Township between 1941 and 1970 sat in tracts that went from an average of 22 percent to almost 60 percent African American, while destination tracts were only 10 percent African American in 1970.
- Physical redevelopment displaced congregations as much as race did: of 195 congregations standing within a quarter mile of a proposed highway or exit ramp in 1960, almost half had moved or closed ten years later.
- Congregants were religious commuters, not neighborhood worshippers: a 1957 study of 23 Indianapolis congregations found almost half of members lived more than two miles away and almost one-fifth more than five miles; 1990s Polis Center analyses found members averaged five miles from church, about half of 170 surveyed churches reported a majority of members came from outside the neighborhood, and only a quarter of residents in four inner-city neighborhoods attended church in their own neighborhood.
Methods
- Historical monograph on religion and metropolitan change in Indianapolis and Marion County, focused mainly on 1940–1970 with an epilogue extending to the 1990s; the author frames Indianapolis as representative of mid-sized Midwestern cities rather than of Chicago, New York, or Los Angeles.
- Draws on archival congregational records and church histories, denominational and church-federation planning reports (e.g., Shippey 1946/1947, Leiffer 1959, Douglass's Comity Report), U.S. Census data, local newspapers (Indianapolis Star, News, Times, Recorder), oral history interviews, and GIS mapping of congregations.
- Analysis is qualitative and descriptive, organized around three geographic strands—suburbanizers, the suburbanized rural periphery, and the "unsuburban" inner city—plus a chapter on Unigov-era consolidation.
Limitations
- The book states no formal limitations section; the author does note that his primary audience began as Polis Center colleagues and that the project was funded by the Lilly Endowment, and he explicitly positions Indianapolis as representative of smaller/mid-sized cities rather than large metropolises (an acknowledged scope choice rather than a stated limitation).
- Evident from the text: the study is a single-metro case study, so generalizations to other regions rest on the author's representativeness argument rather than comparative data; several findings rely on congregational self-reports, church histories, and newspaper accounts, which may smooth over conflict or bias coverage toward congregations that kept records; and the provided text is truncated in Chapter V, so the Unigov analysis cannot be fully assessed here.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
145 Own result · 80 Own interpretation · 61 Sources not found · 19 No basis given · 10 Not checked yet
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In inner-city neighborhoods, white flight and black in-migration challenged the status quo of many congregations.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When observers noted the presence of conservative Protestant groups, they often wrote them off as irrelevant exceptions to the mainline norm.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the s that suburban religious boom turned sour as social observers criticized suburbanites for their vacuous religious experiences and institutions.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the correlations were not exact, the differences between denominationally planted churches and independently sponsored churches tended to break down along theological lines.”
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, these places experienced the postwar period in many of the same ways as the larger metropolitan regions, with outward suburbanization, rural transformation, inner-city change, and the movement of people and institutions in all directions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 82
- It may state two separate claims as one. 92
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
Create a free account to see these claims.
Create a free account to see these assumptions.
160 more claims
Create a free account to see all 315 claims and every source verdict.
Citations
Cited by
'Prophets-for-Profits': Redevelopment and the Altering Urban Religious Landscape
Mian, N. A. (2008) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098008094877 · Cited by 35
Miller, B. J. (2017) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/jssr.12336 · Cited by 27
Rethinking Religion and Secularism in Urban Planning
Manouchehrifar, B., & Forester, J. (2021) · Planning Theory & Practice · doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1908078 · Cited by 23
Christian Colleges in the Locational Wilderness: The Locations of CCCU Institutions
Miller, B. J., & Norquist, B. E. (2020) · Christian Higher Education · doi:10.1080/15363759.2020.1806141 · Cited by 13
Brenneman, R., & Miller, B. J. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190883447.001.0001 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 41-3358-41-3358
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W412423324
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 13 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
- Keywords
- religion, community, postwar United States, metropolitan growth, suburbanization, rural congregations, urban religion, religious change, shopping centers, small towns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-21, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-21 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review