The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things
Abstract
By the author of The Design of Everyday Things , the first book to make the connection between our emotions and how we relate to ordinary objects--from juicers to Jaguars. Did you ever wonder why cheap wine tastes better in fancy glasses? Why sales of Macintosh computers soared when Apple introduced the colorful iMac? New research on emotion and cognition has shown that attractive things really do work better, a fact fans of Don Norman's classic The Design of Everyday Things cannot afford to ignore.In recent years, the design community has focused on making products easier to use. But as Norman amply demonstrates in this fascinating and important new book, design experts have vastly underestimated the role of emotion on our experience of everyday objects. Emotional Design analyzes the profound influence of this deceptively simple idea, from our willingness to spend thousands of dollars on Gucci bags and Rolex watches to the impact of emotion on the everyday objects of tomorrow. In the future, will inanimate objects respond to human emotions? Is it possible to create emotional robots?Norman addresses these provocative questions--drawing on a wealth of examples and the latest scientific insights--in this bold exploration of the objects in our everyday world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2006) · doi:10.1080/01449290500330331 · Cited by 3,026
Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6 · Cited by 2,114
Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications
Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2010.1 · Cited by 1,893
The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products
Hassenzahl, M. (2004) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2 · Cited by 1,083
Secular Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors According to Body Mass Index in US Adults
Gregg, E. W. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.15.1868 · Cited by 959
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 41-6846-41-6846
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1586442777
- Cited by
- 3,085
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.41-6846
- The paper
- Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-6846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.