The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards juristocracy: the origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism
Abstract
In countries and supranational entities around the globe, constitutional reform has transferred an unprecedented amount of power from representative institutions to judiciaries. The constitutionalization of rights and the establishment of judicial review are widely believed to have benevolent and progressive origins, and significant redistributive, power-diffusing consequences. Ran Hirschl challenges this conventional wisdom.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies
Kosař, D. (2016) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316282519 · Cited by 21
Beyond Expropriation Without Compensation
Zenker, O., & Walker, C. (2024) · Beyond Expropriation Without Compensation · doi:10.1017/9781009380829.004 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirschl, R.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ran Hirschl
- ORCID
- Ran Hirschl
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 42-1190-42-1190
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2139100182
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 43
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- GRO (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and International Law Studies
- Keywords
- juristocracy, new constitutionalism, constitutionalization of rights, judicial review, judicialization, constitutional reform, separation of powers, judiciary, representative institutions, power redistribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
