The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations
Abstract
In this landmark work, NEW YORKER columnist James Surowiecki explores a seemingly counter-intuitive idea that has profound implications. Decisions taken by a large group, even if the individuals within the group aren't smart, are always better than decisions made by small numbers of 'experts'. This seemingly simply notion has endless and major ramifications for how businesses operate, how knowledge is advanced, how economies are (or should be) organised and how nation-states fare. With great erudition, Surowiecki ranges across the disciplines of psychology, economics, statistics and history to show just how this principle operates in the real world. Along the way Surowiecki asks a number of intriguing questions about a subject few of us actually understand - economics. What are prices? How does money work? Why do we have corporations? Does advertising work? His answers, rendered in a delightfully clear prose, demystify daunting prospects. As Surowiecki writes: 'The hero of this book is, in a curious sense, an idea, a hero whose story ends up shedding dramatic new light on the landscapes of business, politics and society'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 · Cited by 2,061
Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 · Cited by 2,062
Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map
Niederberger, M., & Spranger, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00457 · Cited by 1,072
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect
Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1008636108 · Cited by 1,017
Haas, B. J., Dobin, A., Li, B., Stransky, N., Pochet, N., & Regev, A. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1842-9 · Cited by 646
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 42-1645-42-1645
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1605255363
- Cited by
- 2,925
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-1645
- The paper
- The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1645
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.