Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Courting democracy in Mexico: party strategies and electoral institutions

·2004·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Figures and tables Acknowledgements 1. Electoral courts and actor compliance: opposition-authoritarian relations and protracted transitions 2. Ties that bind and even constrict: why authoritarians tolerate electoral reforms 3. Mexico's national electoral justice success: from oxymoron to legal norm in just over a decade 4. Mexico's local electoral justice failures: gubernatorial (s)election beyond the shadows of the law 5. The gap between law and practice: institutional failure and opposition success in postelectoral conflicts, 1989-2000 6. The National Action Party: dilemmas of rightist oppositions defined by authoritarian collusion 7. The party of the democratic revolution: from postelectoral movements to electoral competitors 8. Dedazo from the center to finger pointing from the periphery: PRI hard-liners challenge Mexico's electoral institutions 9. A quarter century of 'Mexicanization': lessons from a protracted transition Appendices Bibliography Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.42-1816

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
42
Issue
03
Pages
42-1816-42-1816
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1485646042
Cited by
181
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Courting democracy in Mexico: party strategies and electoral institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-1816
The paper
Courting democracy in Mexico: party strategies and electoral institutions. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1816

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.