The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
Abstract
Publie anterieurement sous le titre : Handbook of qualitative research, 1994 Comprend des references bibliographiques Comprend un index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research
Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690900800105 · Cited by 2,681
Mediators and Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy Research
Kazdin, A. E. (2007) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432 · Cited by 2,504
The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis
Flick, U. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781446282243 · Cited by 2,469
Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004 · Cited by 1,767
Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method
Fletcher, A. J. (2017) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401 · Cited by 1,343
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 43-1330-43-1330
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2126192745
- Cited by
- 10,183
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1330
- The paper
- The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
