The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom
Abstract
How do you get a fourth-grader excited about history? How do you even begin to persuade high school students that mathematical functions are relevant to their everyday lives? In this volume, practical questions that confront every classroom teacher are addressed using the latest exciting research on cognition, teaching, and learning. How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom builds on the discoveries detailed in the bestselling How People Learn. Now, these findings are presented in a way that teachers can use immediately, to revitalize their work in the classroom for even greater effectiveness. Organized for utility, the book explores how the principles of learning can be applied in teaching history, science, and math topics at three levels: elementary, middle, and high school. Leading educators explain in detail how they developed successful curricula and teaching approaches, presenting strategies that serve as models for curriculum development and classroom instruction. Their recounting of personal teaching experiences lends strength and warmth to this volume. The book explores the importance of balancing studentsa (TM) knowledge of historical fact against their understanding of concepts, such as change and cause, and their skills in assessing historical accounts. It discusses how to build straightforward science experiments into true understanding of scientific principles. And it shows how to overcome the difficulties in teaching math to generate real insight and reasoning in math students. It also features illustrated suggestions for classroom activities. How Students Learn offers a highly useful blend of principle and practice. It will be important not only to teachers, administrators, curriculum designers, and teacher educators, but also to parents and the larger community concerned about childrena (TM)s education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 · Cited by 2,733
“…Encouragement for students to elaborate, question, and self-explain; Instruction and curriculum that use apprenticestyle relationships in which knowledgeable practitioners or older peers facilitate students’ everdeeper participation in a particular field or domain (Donovan & Bransford, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialPianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09332374 · Cited by 1,331
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17 · Cited by 1,055
(2007) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 951
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 43-1716-43-1716
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W629040682
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1716
- The paper
- How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1716
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.