Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What do pictures want?: the lives and loves of images

·2006·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

What Do Pictures Want?The Lives and Loves of Images is still relevant today as we live in an age where images are ubiquitous and play an increasingly important role in our lives.The ideas of the book have influenced fields such as visual studies, art history, media studies, and cultural studies, and have been influential in shaping our understanding of the role of images in contemporary culture.It offers a compelling and thought-provoking examination of the relationship between images and viewers, and of how images influence our perception of the world around us.Mitchell's work continues to inspire new research and reflection on the power of images and their relationship to the human experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.43-3192

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
43
Issue
06
Pages
43-3192-43-3192
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W607363940
Cited by
1,206
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What do pictures want?: the lives and loves of images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3192
The paper
What do pictures want?: the lives and loves of images. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.